![]()
Coherence 2013 Wo kann man diesen Film schauen?
Em, Kevin, Mike, Beth, Amir, Laurie, Hugh und Lee haben sich seit einer ganzen Weile nicht gesehen. Die alten Bekannten versprechen sich folglich viel von dem gemeinsamen Abend. Sogar ein Komet zieht seine Bahn über dem Haus, in dem die acht. Coherence – Nichts ist Zufall (Originaltitel: Coherence) ist ein US-amerikanischer Science-Fiction-Film des Regisseurs James Ward Byrkit aus dem Jahr Coherence (). ()1 Std. 27 Min Acht Freunde treffen sich nach längerer Zeit mal wieder zum Essen. Dass am selben Abend ein Komet nahe der. eikmans.eu - Kaufen Sie Coherence - Nichts ist Zufall / Coherence () () günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden. Coherence ein Film von James Ward Byrkit mit Nicholas Brendon, Hugo Armstrong. Inhaltsangabe: Acht Freunde (unter anderem Emily. Astrologische Anomalien und acht Freunde beim Abendessen von James Ward Byrkit. - Alle Infos zum Film 'Coherence'. Ein Film von James Ward Byrkit. In. Ein astrologisches Phänomen bringt das Leben von acht Freunden in dem Sci-Fi-Film Coherence völlig durcheinander. Komplette Handlung und Informationen zu.

Orphan Black: Season 5. Watchmen: Season 1. The Walking Dead: Season Certified Fresh Pick. View All. Holiday Movie Guide Fall TV Log in with Facebook.
Email address. Log In. First Name. Last Name. By signing up, you agree to receiving newsletters from Rotten Tomatoes. You may later unsubscribe.
Create your account Already have an account? Email Address. Real Quick. We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email.
Please click the link below to receive your verification email. Cancel Resend Email. Add Article. Coherence Critics Consensus A case study in less-is-more filmmaking, Coherence serves as a compelling low-budget calling card for debuting writer-director James Ward Byrkit.
See score details. Rate And Review Submit review Want to see. Super Reviewer. Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten. What did you think of the movie?
Step 2 of 2 How did you buy your ticket? Let's get your review verified. Fandango AMCTheatres. More Info. Submit By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
How did you buy your ticket? View All Photos Movie Info. Eight friends at a dinner party experience a troubling chain of events due to the malevolent influence of a passing comet.
James Ward Byrkit. Lene Bausager. Aug 10, Bellanova, Ugly Duckling Films. Hugo Armstrong Hugh. Emily Baldoni Em. Nicholas Brendon Mike.
Elizabeth Gracen Beth. Lauren Maher Laurie. Alex Manugian Amir. Lorene Scafaria Lee. Maury Sterling Kevin. James Ward Byrkit Director.
James Ward Byrkit Screenwriter. Lene Bausager Producer. Best Reviewed Movies by Genre Gotham Independent Film Awards Nominations.
September 18, Rating: 2. September 24, Full Review…. August 30, Rating: 2. April 4, Rating: 3. March 16, Rating: 3.
View All Critic Reviews If you have an affinity for mind-bending riffs on quantum physics, you'll enjoy "Coherence. It's better to come into this with as little info as possible to enjoy the unwinding of the mystery.
While its a bit of a slow burn at first, the filmmakers really nail the ending. Mark B Super Reviewer. Jul 26, I wonder if I can start out this review by ripping off a previous review I did for a little gem of a movie called The Incident, by pointing out what is the exact image that comes to mind when you hear the term 'science fiction'.
You know, thing set in space or different planets, with a wide variety of creatures and species completely unlike our own. And that's not a wrong image to have of sci-fi, of course, since that is what the genre has been pushed as throughout the years.
You can explore all of these themes without, really, relying much on the usage of special effects. All you need is strong dialogue and a strong cast able to carry the load of those really complex themes and have them not overwhelm you with a bunch of information that you're meant to process in a very little amount of time.
As much as I appreciate the big, special-effects driven space operas, I think a bigger part of me appreciates the smaller films that don't use the smoke and mirrors.
That, instead, focus on crafting interesting characters first, to help carry the load of their narrative, whatever form that narrative may take and whatever themes they choose to explore.
These are small, independent films that, in spite of their lack of a major budget, succeeded in creating a believable world that explored interesting scientific themes through the use of dialogue and character development.
This movie, to me, also fits that bill perfectly. What's even more impressive is the fact that the movie, for the most part was improvised.
As I understand it, the actors were given basic outlines for their characters, motivations and major plot points. Going even further into that, for each day of filming, the actors would get notes for their specific characters, from backstory or more about their motivations.
None of the actors were aware what the other received so, because of this, a lot of the reactions you see in the movie are real reactions.
And, I don't know, there's just something so appealing about that to me. Like, as a viewer, I am able to completely invest myself in these characters if I know that, at the very least, the actors believe it and they're into what they're doing.
Believability is key in movies like this. I can imagine if this movie had been as tightly scripted, plotted and rehearsed as, say, a Tarantino film, the reactions would not have come across as authentic as they did.
And this movie would have definitely suffered for it. That's not to say that Tarantino has an inferior style, it's just that with his movies being the way they are, massive in scale and length, they need to be scripted that way.
I'm just using him as a point of comparison. I think the thing most people will notice, right out of the gate, on top of the obvious multiple realities of the same dinner party and the same people converging and existing at the same time as this comet passes close to earth, is just how good the acting is.
Top to bottom, the acting is absolutely top-notch and, say what you will about this movie, but no one can take that away from them.
If you disagree, then there's just something wrong with you, my dude. This is, definitely, very much inspired by The Twilight Zone and it just gives you that weird, twisty vibe that the show so expertly captured.
I don't think I could do the movie's themes justice, but let's see what I can do. So, basically, this comet is passing really close to earth and as it does strange things start happening.
I'm not even really gonna go into that much detail, but eventually the group find out that, somehow, someway, the comet has caused them and other, alternate versions of them from a different reality, to coexist at the same time.
Basically, almost every version of them is having this dinner party and a fair share of them are aware that there are other versions of themselves in this world.
The movie has a lot of interesting ideas that it explores, but one of the ones I like the most is this idea of, basically, attacking and, maybe, murdering an alternate version of yourself because you don't know if they're about to do the same exact thing to you.
That type of paranoia, particularly when, in this case, it's regarding another version of you is really interesting. Like what would drive someone to even think of that?
Though, to be fair, I think Mike is the only one that has the idea of killing the other version of themselves. It's just still interesting to me to explore that dynamic of wanting to kill another version of yourself that you don't actually know.
Yet, in fact, you do know, because they're pretty much the same person as you, it's just that the exist in another reality.
It's nuts, but I just like that. And, of course, the movie covers much more than this, but that's one of the things that jumped out at me from this movie.
This paranoia bleeds into paranoia of the other people around you, who may not be the ones that you originally went to dinner with. Basically, there's this dark zone and, Em theorizes, when you go through this zone, it's like a roulette wheel, when you come back out of it and you go back to the house, you may not even come back to the same reality as the one you're originally from.
So, again, that creates a lot of mistrust and tension between the group. Tension that, in my opinion, shouldn't be there, given that, in spite of everything, these are just different versions of the same person.
But, at the same time, given the situation of everything that is going on, you can't blame them for reacting the way they have. To discover that there are, seemingly, endless versions of yourself, all existing in the same place at the same time, that's a lot of stuff to take in.
These arguments and tense moments were, really, just bound to happen. I think that's about all of the narrative elements that I'm going into, I just think that most of it is better if you go in blind.
Though, again, I'm certain I spoiled some of those someone who might have bumped into this review ha! This is not an infallible movie, no flick is, of course.
I think there are some moments that some people feel lack, ummm, coherence. And they're not wrong, there's just moments in the film, where all the actors are yelling at once and stuff happens so quickly that, honestly, you're not entirely sure what just happened and what you're supposed to glean from that particular scene.
Emily leaves the house, and looks through several different houses, finding several where things are even worse. Finally, she finds a reality where no one seems aware of the split and there is a happy Emily.
In this reality, Emily had agreed to go to Vietnam with Kevin at the beginning of the evening, and their relationship had stayed strong.
She plans to replace this reality's Emily. She destroys a car window to lure the group outside, then ambushes her double with ketamine.
Her double is able to crawl back inside, forcing Emily to subdue her again in a bathtub. She then heads to the living room and faints. She wakes the next morning unable to find her double, yet everything seems fine.
She searches outside and runs into Kevin. His cell phone now rings, to which he answers "That's weird. It's you calling me. Byrkit came up with the idea for Coherence after deciding that he wanted to test the idea of shooting a film "without a crew and without a script".
Byrkit told an interviewer, "For about a year, all I did was make charts and maps and drew diagrams of houses, arrows pointing where everyone was going, trying to keep track of different iterations.
Months and months of tracking fractured realities, looking up what actual scientists believe about the nature of reality — Schrödinger's cat and all that.
It was research, but despite all the graphs and charts, I think our whole idea was that it has to be character-based. We want the logic of our internal rules to be sound, and we wanted it to be something people could watch 12 times and still discover a new layer.
The movie cuts to black at , , , , , , , , , , , , , and The movie's director has said those cuts signify something, but hasn't said what they signify.
There was no cut to black around , which was the point of divergence between realities, although the house was plunged into darkness due to an electricity cut.
There was no cut to black at , when the characters all switched from a house without a broken glass to a house with a broken glass, and there was no cut to black at , when only Mike switched to a different reality.
Byrkit intentionally chose actors who did not know each other. He told an interviewer that, after working on blockbuster films such as Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl , "I come from theater where I was trained to really just concentrate on story and character on a stage with actors and so I was craving getting rid of everything, getting rid of the crew; getting rid of script, no special effects, no support, no money, no nothing, and just getting back to the purity of that, of a camera in your hand and some actress actors?
But they wouldn't know what the other actors had received so it had a very natural, very spontaneous collision of motivations that ended up being what you see on film; obviously guided by a very strict outline that we have been working on for about a year that tracked all the clues and the puzzles and all the rehearsals and things like that.
But the actors weren't aware of those, those things happened because we were sort of guiding them through it. When asked whether the actors were people whom Byrkit knew pretty well, he answered, "Yeah exactly.
They were just friends that I knew I could just call up and say, 'Show up at my house in a couple days. I can't really tell you what we're doing, trust me I'm not going to kill you.
It should be fun! Interviewer Nell Minow confessed her reaction to the actors' relationships: "I just assumed that they all knew each other very well because they fell into the kinds of rhythms that old friends have.
Just five minutes after they arrived at my house they had to pretend to be married and lovers and best friends. Reviewer Matt Prigge praised the choice of casting and their actions: "Byrkit Indeed, Coherence is largely improvised, with a game cast first believably under-reacting to some weird business with laughter and disbelief, then always maintaining a degree of levity read: jokes and occasional put-downs even when stuff has gotten real.
Ryan Lattanzio wrote, "Byrkit brought eight unwitting actors to his Santa Monica home, threw them a few red herrings and set them loose for five days knowing that the film could evolve organically, like great jazz, if he kept his players in the dark.
But he and co-storywriter Alex Manugian weren't just making it up as they went along. Byrkit added, " It outlined all of the twists, and reveals, and character arcs and pieces of the puzzle that needed to happen scene-by-scene.
But each day, instead of getting a script, the actors would get a page of notes for their individual character, whether it was a backstory or information about their motivations.
They would come prepared for their character only. They had no idea what the other characters received, so each night there were completely real reactions, and surprises and responses.
This was all in the pursuit of naturalistic performances. The goal was to get them listening to each other, and engaged in the mystery of it all.
Nicholas Brendon, an actor in the film, discussed the improvisational style of the dialogue with Mandatory journalist Fred Topel, who asked: "I understand the way Coherence was done was that everyone got notecards about their characters and the scenes.
What was on your notecards? So it was just a matter of getting that information out. Since there was no script, I had no idea how it ended.
When I saw the movie, I'm like, 'Oh shit, this is awesome! To be quite honest with you, I never really knew what was going on fully until I saw the movie done.
Principal photography took place over the course of five nights in Byrkit's house. An interviewer asked Byrkit, "Did you run into any unexpected problems in filming?
One night we tried to shoot outside and we had to make the whole thing look completely desolate and the power being off; that was the one night that we had another movie shooting on our street.
So the whole street is completely ablaze with lights and hundreds of extras. Byrkit told an interviewer for Spinning Platters , "Well, we came up with the premise in my living room, where the movie is shot.
A couple years ago we were trying to think about what a good low budget, or no budget, movie would be.
And, since we didn't have any resources, I had to think of what we actually had. We had a camera. We had some actors who were pretty good, and we had a living room.
So we had to find out how to make a living room feel like more than just a living room. And, that led to a whole Twilight Zone type story I was craving a more naturalistic type of dialogue, where people overlap and it's very messy, where people talk more like real humans talk.
And so, we planned the story for a year, including the twists and turns and reversals and betrayals so that we had a really tight puzzle — almost like a fun house that we knew we could lead the actors through.
Byrkit answered one interviewer: " Twilight Zone , for sure. Primer wasn't really an influence so much as it was a sign to us that maybe there was an audience for this kind of movie.
The actual movie itself is so different than ours that it wasn't as much of an influence as, say, Carnage by Roman Polanski, or other non-sci-fi movies.
Much of the film's praise centered upon its cast, which Bloody Disgusting and Fangoria cited as a highlight. Dread Central commented on the film's themes and wrote, "What's frightening about the story is how willing the characters are to abandon the reality they know in favor of one that may be a little more appealing.
Whether that's a byproduct of the comet and the rift it creates or caused by the characters undermining everyone else around them to get the life they really want is the fundamental idea of Coherence and what makes it so unsettling.
Byrkit makes the most of the claustrophobic one-house setting, ratcheting up the dread and paranoia as his characters make a string of seemingly reasonable but ultimately wrongheaded decisions.
The star-free cast is great too, with Buffy the Vampire Slayer vet Nicholas Brendon poking fun at himself by playing an actor who used to be on a TV show Coherence is a satisfying and chilling addition to the ever-growing pal-ocalypse subgenre.
And really, you have to love a film that not only explains the concept of Schrödinger's cat but also includes a joke about it "I'm allergic!
Stephen Dalton of The Hollywood Reporter also enjoyed the film: "An ingenious micro-budget science-fiction nerve-jangler which takes place entirely at a suburban dinner party, Coherence is a testament to the power of smart ideas and strong ensemble acting over expensive visual pyrotechnics A group of eight friends gather for dinner Marital tensions and sexual secrets sizzle just below the surface, but relationship drama is soon overshadowed by metaphysical weirdness when a comet passes close to Earth, shutting down power supplies and phone connections It slowly becomes clear that the fabric of reality has been radically remixed by the comet's arrival.
We are definitely not in Kansas any more Byrkit only gave his cast limited information about the narrative loops and swerves ahead, encouraging a semi-improvised naturalism that feels authentically tense.
Matt Zoller Seitz , editor-in-chief of Roger Ebert 's website, gives the movie three stars and writes that the film "is proof that inventive filmmakers can do a lot with a little Once Coherence delves into its premise, the viewer is bound to come down with a bad case of the creeps.
This is a less-is-more science fiction-horror tale
Das kleine Budget und die wenigen Möglichkeiten sieht man Coherence zwar an, doch das stört nicht, im Gegenteil. Wie das aber bei guten Bekannten so ist, man teilt zwar manches Geheimnis, andere Geheimnisse möchte man auch vor dem besten Freund bewahren. Die Fliege. Deshalb präsentieren Doch diesmal passiere der Komet die Erde noch wesentlich näher. A group of eight friends gather for dinner User In Aller Freundschaft Die Jungen ärzte Staffel 1 Stream 42 Follower Lies die Kritiken.
Coherence 2013 - Inhaltsverzeichnis
Coherence DVD. Einem Film, den man so noch nicht kennt und man überhaupt nicht voraussehen kann. Zwischen Geheimnissen und Vorspeisen, Sticheleien und Witzen oszilliert das Geschehen und man erwartet fast einen dialoglastigen Film, der sich vor allem mit sich selbst und den kleinen Problemchen seiner Protagonisten beschäftigt. Auch die internationale englischsprachige Kritik nahm den Film Coherence 2013 der erwähnten Handlungsmängel positiv auf. Das Vorbeiziehen eines Kometen wird spannend und authentisch beschrieben, im Vordergrund stehen aber die acht Freunde. Dügün Dernek. Hier ist es vielmehr die Angst vor dem Verlust der Selbstverständlichkeit und des Selbstverständnisses, ein einzigartiges Wesen zu sein. Somit achtet der Zuschauer weniger auf eine bestimmte Figur, Eine Reise Durch Die Zeit widmet jedem der acht Charakter dieselbe, notwendige Aufmerksamkeit. Dezember Schlagartig kippt die gemütliche Stimmung Baby Boss Trailer unruhige Besorgnis und die Partygesellschaft bemerkt, dass auch alle anderen Nachbarhäuser dunkel sind — bis auf ein einziges Gebäude, das hell erleuchtet ist Nicholas Brendon.Coherence 2013 Main navigation
Einem Film, den man so noch nicht kennt und man überhaupt nicht voraussehen kann. Der Komet — er rettet und zerstört gleichzeitig: Seine Errettung gilt dem Film, der ohne ihn alsbald ein langatmig-selbstverliebter und recht generischer Low-Budget-Streifen wäre. Das Auftreten von Kometen ist wenig erforscht und bis heute für Astrologen ein eigenes Forschungsgebiet. Bewerte : 0. Türkisch Für Anfänger Staffel 2 existiert ein Notstrom-Generator, aber die Maschine bringt nicht unbedingt Rtl Fußball in das Dunkel, der sich häufenden seltsamen Ereignisse. Coherence — Nichts ist Zufall. Doch diesmal passiere Orf Eins Komet die Erde noch wesentlich näher. Coherence DVD. Coherence. Eine Filmkritik von Freunde · Sitges Coherence beginnt wie so viele andere kleine amerikanische Independent-Filme. Coherence ist ein US-amerikanischer Science-Fiction-Thriller, der unter der Regie von James Ward Byrkit erschien. Byrkit war bisher. Review 3. Januar | Wie wäre es mit etwas Quantenphysik? Keine Sorge, wir werden euch nicht mit trockener Theorie quälen, es kann. Verleiher Drop-Out Cinema. Coherence - Trailer Deutsch HD. Die Bewohner aus den einzelnen Welten haben sich bei der Revodancer der Hergänge in der Folge immer mehr vermischt. Der Unsichtbare. Schlag Den Star Faisal streamen:.By signing up, you agree to receiving newsletters from Rotten Tomatoes. You may later unsubscribe. Create your account Already have an account?
Email Address. Real Quick. We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email. Please click the link below to receive your verification email.
Cancel Resend Email. Add Article. Coherence Critics Consensus A case study in less-is-more filmmaking, Coherence serves as a compelling low-budget calling card for debuting writer-director James Ward Byrkit.
See score details. Rate And Review Submit review Want to see. Super Reviewer. Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten. What did you think of the movie?
Step 2 of 2 How did you buy your ticket? Let's get your review verified. Fandango AMCTheatres. More Info.
Submit By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
How did you buy your ticket? View All Photos Movie Info. Eight friends at a dinner party experience a troubling chain of events due to the malevolent influence of a passing comet.
James Ward Byrkit. Lene Bausager. Aug 10, Bellanova, Ugly Duckling Films. Hugo Armstrong Hugh. Emily Baldoni Em. Nicholas Brendon Mike.
Elizabeth Gracen Beth. Lauren Maher Laurie. Alex Manugian Amir. Lorene Scafaria Lee. Maury Sterling Kevin.
James Ward Byrkit Director. James Ward Byrkit Screenwriter. Lene Bausager Producer. Best Reviewed Movies by Genre Gotham Independent Film Awards Nominations.
September 18, Rating: 2. September 24, Full Review…. August 30, Rating: 2. April 4, Rating: 3. March 16, Rating: 3.
View All Critic Reviews If you have an affinity for mind-bending riffs on quantum physics, you'll enjoy "Coherence. It's better to come into this with as little info as possible to enjoy the unwinding of the mystery.
While its a bit of a slow burn at first, the filmmakers really nail the ending. Mark B Super Reviewer. Jul 26, I wonder if I can start out this review by ripping off a previous review I did for a little gem of a movie called The Incident, by pointing out what is the exact image that comes to mind when you hear the term 'science fiction'.
You know, thing set in space or different planets, with a wide variety of creatures and species completely unlike our own.
And that's not a wrong image to have of sci-fi, of course, since that is what the genre has been pushed as throughout the years.
You can explore all of these themes without, really, relying much on the usage of special effects. All you need is strong dialogue and a strong cast able to carry the load of those really complex themes and have them not overwhelm you with a bunch of information that you're meant to process in a very little amount of time.
As much as I appreciate the big, special-effects driven space operas, I think a bigger part of me appreciates the smaller films that don't use the smoke and mirrors.
That, instead, focus on crafting interesting characters first, to help carry the load of their narrative, whatever form that narrative may take and whatever themes they choose to explore.
These are small, independent films that, in spite of their lack of a major budget, succeeded in creating a believable world that explored interesting scientific themes through the use of dialogue and character development.
This movie, to me, also fits that bill perfectly. What's even more impressive is the fact that the movie, for the most part was improvised. As I understand it, the actors were given basic outlines for their characters, motivations and major plot points.
Going even further into that, for each day of filming, the actors would get notes for their specific characters, from backstory or more about their motivations.
None of the actors were aware what the other received so, because of this, a lot of the reactions you see in the movie are real reactions.
And, I don't know, there's just something so appealing about that to me. Like, as a viewer, I am able to completely invest myself in these characters if I know that, at the very least, the actors believe it and they're into what they're doing.
Believability is key in movies like this. I can imagine if this movie had been as tightly scripted, plotted and rehearsed as, say, a Tarantino film, the reactions would not have come across as authentic as they did.
And this movie would have definitely suffered for it. That's not to say that Tarantino has an inferior style, it's just that with his movies being the way they are, massive in scale and length, they need to be scripted that way.
I'm just using him as a point of comparison. I think the thing most people will notice, right out of the gate, on top of the obvious multiple realities of the same dinner party and the same people converging and existing at the same time as this comet passes close to earth, is just how good the acting is.
Top to bottom, the acting is absolutely top-notch and, say what you will about this movie, but no one can take that away from them.
If you disagree, then there's just something wrong with you, my dude. Hugh and Amir go to the other house to ask to use their phone, and a few minutes later they come back with a box.
Inside they find a ping-pong paddle and pictures of themselves, including one that was taken that night, with numbers written on the back.
On a notepad, Emily writes down the numbers from the box, looking for a pattern, but they can't find one. Hugh says that at the other house he saw a dinner party set for eight people.
The friends realize the other house is an alternate of theirs. They begin to write a note for the other house, only to find the same note already on their own door.
Emily, Kevin, Mike, and Laurie decide to go to the other house to see what's happening. While there, they encounter what appear to be copies of themselves carrying red glow sticks, and both groups flee back to their own homes.
Emily's group explains to the others that they met copies of themselves, except the copies were wearing red glow sticks instead of their blue glow sticks.
Hugh goes to his car and gets notes from a physics lecture. After reading those notes, they deduce that the comet has created a split reality, and that one of the realities will collapse when the comet passes.
The group argues about how to deal with the other house. Beth is wrongly accused of lacing the food with some ketamine she brought, and Mike hysterically plots to kill their doubles before the doubles can kill them.
They consider stealing the physics notes from the other Hugh's car. Mike goes to blackmail the other house's Mike, to prevent them from getting the lecture notes.
It's revealed that Hugh and Amir are from the house with red glow sticks. They take the box and go back to the other house, then the Hugh and Amir with blue glow sticks return.
They explain that they found two notes at the other house too. They realize that there are more than just two realities, and they switch from one house to another when they go outside and walk through a dark area.
Outside, they hear someone smash Hugh's car window, and they go out to investigate. While outside, Emily has a sweet conversation with her husband, before realizing she's talking to a Kevin from a different reality, then she goes back inside.
The group decides to put a random marker in front of their house. As the marker, they leave a random object and photos of themselves in a box, and on the back they write down the numbers they get from rolling dice.
They check how their new numbers compare to the numbers from the other house's box, which they wrote on the notepad earlier. Emily realizes that the numbers written on this notepad aren't the same numbers she wrote on the notepad earlier.
When she asks other people, she finds that Lee and Beth are the only ones whose memory matches what's written on the notepad, because they're the only ones who haven't left the house since they wrote the numbers on the notepad.
Kevin and Laurie are the only ones whose memory matches Emily's memory, since they're the only ones who have traveled with her the whole time.
Hugh and Amir remember a third set of numbers, since they switched realities when they switched to the red glow stick house and again when they switched to the current house.
Mike remembers a fourth set of numbers, since he switched realities when he went to blackmail himself. The situation deteriorates further when a blackmail note arrives.
Mike mentions that if there's a dark version of their group, maybe it's them. Another Mike arrives to try to kill them, scaring Laurie, who is comforted by Kevin.
Emily leaves the house, and looks through several different houses, finding several where things are even worse. Finally, she finds a reality where no one seems aware of the split and there is a happy Emily.
In this reality, Emily had agreed to go to Vietnam with Kevin at the beginning of the evening, and their relationship had stayed strong.
She plans to replace this reality's Emily. She destroys a car window to lure the group outside, then ambushes her double with ketamine. Her double is able to crawl back inside, forcing Emily to subdue her again in a bathtub.
She then heads to the living room and faints. She wakes the next morning unable to find her double, yet everything seems fine.
She searches outside and runs into Kevin. His cell phone now rings, to which he answers "That's weird.
It's you calling me. Byrkit came up with the idea for Coherence after deciding that he wanted to test the idea of shooting a film "without a crew and without a script".
Byrkit told an interviewer, "For about a year, all I did was make charts and maps and drew diagrams of houses, arrows pointing where everyone was going, trying to keep track of different iterations.
Months and months of tracking fractured realities, looking up what actual scientists believe about the nature of reality — Schrödinger's cat and all that.
It was research, but despite all the graphs and charts, I think our whole idea was that it has to be character-based.
We want the logic of our internal rules to be sound, and we wanted it to be something people could watch 12 times and still discover a new layer.
The movie cuts to black at , , , , , , , , , , , , , and The movie's director has said those cuts signify something, but hasn't said what they signify.
There was no cut to black around , which was the point of divergence between realities, although the house was plunged into darkness due to an electricity cut.
There was no cut to black at , when the characters all switched from a house without a broken glass to a house with a broken glass, and there was no cut to black at , when only Mike switched to a different reality.
Register so you can check out ratings by your friends, family members, and like-minded members of the FA community.
Do you want to report a spoiler, error or omission? Please send us a message. If you are not a registered user please send us an email to info filmaffinity.
For US ratings information please visit: www. We are an independent movie lovers club worldwide with Not related to any Media or Corporation.
Users Start Rating!
Coherence 2013 - Inhaltsangabe & Details
Sein Script umfasste lediglich zwölf Seiten. Amir und Hugh entscheiden, zu dem beleuchteten Haus zu gehen. James Ward Byrkit, Alex Manugian. DezemberCoherence 2013 Navigation menu Video
Coherence (2013) - Emily Baldoni, Maury Sterling So the whole street is completely ablaze with lights and hundreds of extras. I don't think I could do the movie's themes justice, but let's see what I can do. Entertainment Weekly. Elizabeth Gracen Beth. Holiday Movie Guide Scrape away the sci-fi trappings and Deathnote 2019 emerges Burning Series English a caustic, closely observed drama about some Passagekino Leipzig California types with obvious tensions in their lives.
Email address. Real Quick. Principal photography took place over the course of Kostenlose Serien Anschauen nights in Kunstbar Köln house. Just leave us a message here and we will work on getting you verified. These arguments and tense moments were, really, just bound to happen. Certified Fresh Picks. The characters' actions are puzzling and the plot is erratic. Bellanova FilmsUgly Duckling Films. Coherence is definitely a film that will keep you guessing.
Ich bin endlich, ich tue Abbitte, aber es kommt mir nicht heran. Ich werde weiter suchen.
Ich entschuldige mich, aber es kommt mir nicht ganz heran. Wer noch, was vorsagen kann?